What is OpenDAO (SOS) crypto coin? A complete breakdown of its origin, value, and current status

What is OpenDAO (SOS) crypto coin? A complete breakdown of its origin, value, and current status Mar, 18 2025

OpenDAO (SOS) Value Calculator

Calculate how much OpenDAO (SOS) tokens you might have received based on your OpenSea trading volume before December 25, 2021.

Note: This tool uses estimated values based on historical data. Actual tokens received depended on OpenSea's total trading volume.

OpenDAO (SOS) isn’t your typical crypto coin. It didn’t launch with a whitepaper, a team of founders, or a big marketing campaign. Instead, it dropped unexpectedly on December 25, 2021 - Christmas Day - as a surprise gift to people who had traded NFTs on OpenSea. If you bought, sold, or swapped any NFT on OpenSea before that date, you were eligible to claim SOS tokens for free. No sign-up. No KYC. Just a simple wallet connection. And for a while, it felt like magic.

But here’s the truth: OpenDAO (SOS) is now a ghost of its early hype. It’s still on the blockchain, still tradable, and still held by nearly 190,000 wallets. But its price? It’s barely worth a penny. Its trading volume? Almost zero. And its purpose? Still unclear.

How OpenDAO (SOS) was born

OpenDAO was created by an anonymous group with no public names, no Twitter account, and no roadmap. Their only statement? They wanted to build "the token of the metaverse" - a community-owned asset that would help fix problems in the NFT world. Specifically, they aimed to:

  • Compensate users who got scammed on OpenSea
  • Support emerging NFT artists
  • Preserve digital art
  • Fund developers building tools for the SOS ecosystem

They didn’t create a new platform. They didn’t build a wallet. They didn’t even launch a decentralized exchange. All they did was distribute 100 trillion SOS tokens - a number so huge it’s hard to imagine.

Half of those tokens - 50 trillion - went directly to OpenSea users based on how much they traded. The rest was split: 20% for staking rewards, 20% for a DAO treasury, and 10% for liquidity on exchanges. The catch? You had to claim your tokens by June 30, 2022. After that, unclaimed SOS tokens went into the DAO treasury, not burned. That’s unusual. Most projects destroy unused tokens. OpenDAO kept them.

It’s an ERC-20 token on Ethereum

OpenDAO (SOS) runs on Ethereum as an ERC-20 token. That means you need an Ethereum wallet - like MetaMask, Trust Wallet, or Coinbase Wallet - to hold it. You can’t store SOS on Solana, Binance Chain, or any other network. And despite what some websites claim, there’s no "Solana Swap (SOS)". That’s a completely different, unrelated token with the same ticker.

Claiming SOS back in 2021 was simple. You connected your wallet to the OpenDAO website, verified your OpenSea trading history, and got your tokens instantly. It took less than five minutes. But now? There’s no official claim portal. The site still exists, but it’s frozen. No updates. No new features. Just a static page.

Why SOS lost its value

Right after launch, SOS spiked. Prices jumped over 1,200% in days. People were buying it on Uniswap, posting about it on Reddit, and hoping to get rich. But that excitement didn’t last. Why?

Because SOS had no real use.

Compare it to ApeCoin (APE), which powers the Bored Ape Yacht Club ecosystem. You need APE to buy virtual land in Otherside. Or LooksRare (LOOK), which rewards traders with tokens for buying NFTs on its marketplace. Those tokens have built-in demand. SOS? Nothing. You can’t use it to pay for NFTs. You can’t vote on governance proposals (there’s no active DAO). You can’t stake it for meaningful rewards. There’s no app that accepts it. No game, no platform, no service.

That’s the core problem. OpenDAO was built on generosity - not utility. It gave away tokens to people who already owned NFTs. But it never gave them a reason to keep using them.

By November 2023, SOS was trading at around $0.00000215. That’s less than a millionth of a dollar per token. Its market cap hovered around $200,000 - tiny compared to even the smallest real crypto projects. Trading volume? Often $0. On the days it did trade, it was under $200. That means if you tried to sell 1 billion SOS tokens, you’d likely crash the price because no one else is buying.

Dusty DAO treasury vault overflowing with SOS tokens, one glowing red token amid the pile.

Who still holds SOS?

Over 189,000 wallets hold SOS. That’s a lot of people - wider distribution than most crypto tokens. But most of them are just sitting on it.

On Reddit, users in r/opendao are divided. One top post says: "Claimed my SOS back in January 2022 thinking it would be valuable, but I’ve never found a single legitimate use case for it." Another says: "I’m holding for the long term because eventually someone will build something useful with it."

That’s the split: speculators who bought in early hoping for a rebound, and idealists who still believe in the original vision - even if nothing’s happened in over two years.

There’s no official team to update the community. No GitHub commits. No blog posts. No Twitter updates since mid-2022. The Telegram group has a few hundred members, but moderators rarely respond. The project is dormant.

What experts say about OpenDAO

Crypto analysts are blunt.

Alex Thorn from Galaxy Digital called it "a solution in search of a problem." Delphi Digital’s Matthew Graham labeled it a "digital fossil" - interesting historically, but economically dead. Blockchain economist Dr. Jason Potts wrote in a 2023 paper that OpenDAO proves one thing: "Massive token distribution alone can’t create value without demand mechanisms."

The biggest failure? No burning mechanism. No revenue share. No fee redistribution. No utility. Just 100 trillion tokens floating in wallets with nowhere to go.

Two figures on a digital cliff, one holding a zero-value SOS screen, distant app icon fading into static.

Can SOS ever come back?

Technically, yes. Someone could rebuild it. A new team could take over the treasury. They could launch a marketplace, a staking app, or a grant program. But no one has.

And why would they? The treasury holds 20 trillion SOS - worth about $43,000 at current prices. That’s not enough to fund a serious project. Even if they sold half of it, they’d only get $21,500. That’s less than a developer’s annual salary.

Without funding, without a team, and without a plan, SOS has no path forward. It’s not dead - it’s just forgotten.

Should you buy SOS today?

If you’re looking to invest? No.

There’s no upside. No catalyst. No reason to believe the price will rise. Even if it did, the liquidity is so low that selling your tokens would be nearly impossible without losing 90% of your value.

If you already hold SOS? You’re not alone. But you’re holding a token with no function, no support, and no future. The only value it has now is as a reminder - of how hype can create a bubble, and how quickly it can collapse when there’s no real purpose behind it.

OpenDAO (SOS) is a lesson in tokenomics. It shows that giving away free tokens doesn’t build a community - building real utility does. It’s not about how many people get the coin. It’s about what they can do with it.

Today, SOS is just a number on a blockchain. A relic of a moment when the NFT world thought magic could replace mechanics. And that’s all it will ever be.

10 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Tom Van bergen

    December 7, 2025 AT 00:28
    SOS isn't dead it's just waiting for the next wave of idiots to buy it
    Every crypto project starts as a joke and ends as a religion. SOS is just the most honest one.
  • Image placeholder

    Sandra Lee Beagan

    December 7, 2025 AT 16:45
    I still have my SOS tokens... I know they're worth nothing but I keep them like a little digital souvenir from when NFTs felt like art and not just gambling. 🌱
    It's not about the price. It's about the memory.
  • Image placeholder

    Ben VanDyk

    December 7, 2025 AT 18:11
    The fact that people still think this has value is the real crypto scam.
    100 trillion tokens. That's not airdrop. That's inflation on steroids. No wonder it's worthless.
  • Image placeholder

    michael cuevas

    December 8, 2025 AT 14:29
    So you're telling me the entire project was just a christmas present that nobody asked for?
    And now we're supposed to treat it like a serious investment?
    Wow. Just wow.
  • Image placeholder

    Nina Meretoile

    December 9, 2025 AT 21:46
    I don't care if it's worth $0.00000215. I believe in the vision. Someone will build something beautiful with it. Maybe not today. Maybe not tomorrow. But someday. And when they do, the people who held on will be the ones who remembered what crypto was supposed to be about. ❤️
  • Image placeholder

    Barb Pooley

    December 11, 2025 AT 16:06
    They never burned the tokens. That's not an accident. That's a trap. They wanted us to keep holding. They wanted us to think it might come back. But the treasury is just a graveyard for dead coins. They knew it was doomed from day one.
  • Image placeholder

    Shane Budge

    December 12, 2025 AT 15:05
    Why does anyone still talk about this?
  • Image placeholder

    Adam Bosworth

    December 14, 2025 AT 06:04
    OpenDAO is a psyop. The devs are sitting on 20 trillion tokens worth $43k and laughing while we all argue about whether it's dead or not. The real game was never SOS. It was watching us fight over trash for two years. Classic.
  • Image placeholder

    Uzoma Jenfrancis

    December 15, 2025 AT 10:05
    In Africa we have something called 'ghost coins' - tokens that were given away for free and then abandoned. SOS is not unique. It is just American nostalgia dressed in blockchain. The world moves on. Why do you cling to dead things?
  • Image placeholder

    Renelle Wilson

    December 16, 2025 AT 02:57
    While the economic utility of OpenDAO (SOS) is demonstrably absent, its cultural significance as a decentralized gesture of goodwill remains a poignant artifact of the NFT era's idealistic phase. The absence of a formal governance structure, liquidity incentives, or developer roadmap does not negate the symbolic intentionality behind its creation - a moment when community was prioritized over capitalization. To dismiss it as a 'fossil' is to misunderstand the nature of digital collectives: they do not require perpetual growth to hold meaning. The wallets that still hold SOS are not merely holding tokens; they are preserving a quiet act of digital generosity in an increasingly transactional landscape. Perhaps its true value lies not in its price, but in its quiet persistence.

Write a comment